Who Is on the Board of Review Cook Co

Abdelnasser Rashid, Cook County Board of Review Democratic primary candidate.

Provided photo

Candidate profile

Abdelnasser Rashid

Running for:Cook County Lath of Review, 1st District

Political/civic background:I served equally Policy Director and then Deputy Principal of Staff for sometime Cook Canton Clerk David Orr, and equally Principal Policy Officeholder for Cook County Assessor Fritz Kaegi. I led a successful attempt to aid senior citizens salve time and coin by passing legislation to automatically renew the senior exemption, instead of forcing seniors to utilize for the exemption each year. I previously ran for Melt County Commissioner confronting the chairman of the Cook County Republican Party.

Occupation:Erstwhile Deputy Assessor, full-fourth dimension Board of Review candidate & Neubauer Civic Scholar at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business

Teaching:Harvard Academy '11

Neubauer Civic Scholar (MBA Candidate) at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business concern

Campaign website: rashidforcook.com

Facebook: @rashidforcook

Twitter: @rashidforcook

Instagram: @rashidforcook

---

As the Cook County assessor moves to make assessments more transparent and reduce the need for appeals, as he has pledged to practise, what volition you practice to reduce the overhead in your part?

Fifty-fifty before appeal volumes drib, equally they should, the Board of Review should look to salve taxpayer dollars by increasing efficiencies using technology and data to brand more accurate and faster determinations. In addition, the Illinois Property Tax Appeals Lath (PTAB) excess related to Cook County has increased overhead for the Board of Review. Reducing this backlog is a potential source of overhead reduction likewise.

Over time, every bit assessments go more than accurate, the volume of appeals will subtract, which should issue in less overhead. This will likely occur over several years, partly because the Assessor volition consummate the full bicycle of triennial assessments in 2021. In add-on, information technology will take some adjustment to break a civilisation of habitual appeals. Therefore in the coming few years, we are likely to keep to run into high appeal volumes. Information technology volition exist important for the Board of Review to establish a clear practice that appeals will only be granted based on fair market place value—not for whatsoever other reason. This is an of import step in reducing appeal volumes and overhead.

As a former Deputy Main of Staff for Melt County Clerk David Orr, my responsibilities included collaborating with multiple stakeholders on the agency's budget. I take ever been guided by values of disinterestedness, transparency and efficiency. I volition bring that same approach equally a Lath of Review Commissioner.

The Board of Review historically has been described as a trunk that greases squeaky wheels — people who file appeals — rather than working more mostly to be an czar of uniformity in assessments. What's your view of the board'southward proper role?

The Board of Review's proper role is straightforward: determine whether the Assessor's valuation of a holding is off-white, based on the fair market value, and correct the valuation if information technology is mistaken. These valuations should be based on market averages, not the operating choices fabricated by a property owner, such as the choice to keep a belongings vacant if the market would otherwise provide a renter. As such, the Board of Review should obtain the all-time market information available from a diversity of sources, including databases such as Trepp.

In the past, people who were dissatisfied with a ruling from the Board of Review could go to court to appeal that conclusion only had to testify "constructive fraud" —that there had been fraud or gross error in making the original assessment. That standard has been fabricated less stringent. Has this been a modify for the better, or has it resulted in likewise many baseless court appeals? Please explicate.

The Assessor and the Board of Review are all-time equipped to handle valuations and appeals, and courts should exist a last resort only when there is gross error or fraud. It is unclear exactly how many appeals cases are in the court system, but given the significant number of appeals at the Lath of Review and the Illinois Property Tax Appeals Board, it is probable that there are as well many appeals in the courts.

The Board of Review has property valuation professionals and subject area thing experts whose function is to prevent courts from beingness flooded with assessment appeals. The agency's role is to weigh the evidence and make a proper determination. If a taxpayer is unhappy with the assessment after multiple opportunities to appeal, there should be a stringent but reasonable standard to take the instance to court.

Are there too many or few avenues of appeals — the county assessor's office, the Board of Review, the Illinois Property Taxation Appeals Board, the courts — available to property owners? In your view, which avenues should be?

With an appeals process through the Assessor, the Board of Review, as well as remedies through the courts, it is appropriate to revisit the extent to which the Illinois Property Tax Appeals Board should have jurisdiction over Cook County. PTAB only began to hear cases from Cook County subsequently 1996 legislation. But we should exist conscientious not to unintentionally transfer the PTAB excess to the courts instead. This would continue to forcefulness local governments to wait several years for an event and prolong budget instability. Scaling back PTAB jurisdiction over Cook County must be coupled with enforcing a more stringent standard to have cases to courtroom.

The context exterior of Cook County may be dissimilar due to the unique needs and limited resources in smaller counties.

Should governmental units be given more time to argue that particularly big properties are nether-assessed? Please explain.

Yes, they should have more time. Under-assessment of large commercial properties leads to an unfair brunt existence placed on homeowners and small businesses, and local government should have the advisable time to mount an informed objection. It could take significant time and resources for local governments to assemble the appropriate data, evidence and experts to mountain a challenge.

Are staffers fairly distributed among the three Cook Canton Board of Review commissioners? Please explain.

The current allocation is unfair: staffers should be adequately distributed to all commissioners. At the same fourth dimension, each commissioner should share equal responsibility for the work of the agency. Ultimately, the Board needs to work together as i agency on behalf of homeowners and taxpayers.

What should be the role of the Melt County Board of Review in providing technical help to school districts and other local taxing bodies when they challenge decisions by the Illinois Belongings Tax Appeals Board to trim assessments? Please explain.

First, the Board of Review as a matter of course should provide ample documentation nigh how information technology arrives at its decisions—including information about capitalization rates, rent, and vacancy. More than thorough documentation provides greater transparency to the public and local taxing bodies about the Board's methodology and assumptions. With this information, local governments are less likely to seek technical support from the Board. However, the Board should ever be a resource for taxing bodies seeking technical assistance. The goal must exist fairness and accuracy, and school districts and municipalities are a welcome partner to achieving that goal.

Should yous have to be a lawyer to represent someone earlier the Board of Review? Why or why non?

No, you should not have to exist a lawyer. Many other states and jurisdictions exterior of Illinois do not require an attorney, but let other experienced professionals to represent taxpayers. I believe property owners should be able to make their own choice near whether to hire an chaser or another qualified professional. Homeowners could have highly professional representation at a lower cost than many attorneys would likely charge.

Is information technology acceptable for a member of the Board of Review to work as a lobbyist at whatever level of government in Illinois? Delight explain.

No, information technology is non acceptable. Elected officials have a duty to stand for the interests of their constituents and not any detail interest grouping.

What historical figure from Illinois, other than Abraham Lincoln (because everybody'due south big on Abe), do you most admire or describe inspiration from? Please explain.

Former Chicago Mayor Harold Washington. He built a diverse, multi-racial coalition of communities and leaders to advance the interests of working families and fight corruption. We need his same coalition-building and fighting spirit to accost the challenges we're facing today.

What's your favorite TV, streaming or web-based show of all time. Why?

Stranger Things, because I missed all only five months of the 1980s, and I similar to believe that we'll prevail over the monsters in our ain upside down. Also, Hopper is however alive.

gresswellhatemaked.blogspot.com

Source: https://chicago.suntimes.com/2020/1/23/21075818/abdelnasser-rashid-cook-county-board-review-1st-district-democrat-candidate-2020-primary-election

Share this post